Oblique Graphs
نویسندگان
چکیده
The main issue of this work is to investigate asymmetric structures in graphs. While symmetry structures in graphs are well observed, the opposite question has not been investigated deeply so far. It is known from a theorem of Wright, that almost all graphs are asymmetric. The class of asymmetric graphs is restricted further by forbidding even local symmetries. The main question is to determine how many graphs do have this stronger so-called obliqueness property. On the one hand the superclass of asymmetric graphs is not only infinite, but contains almost all graphs. On the other hand many Ramsey type results indicate, that growing structures enforce at least local symmetries or regularities. In the first part of the work oblique structures in polyhedral graphs are investigated. Several type definitions for faces and edges of a polyhedral graph are introduced. A polyhedral graph is called oblique with respect to a type definition if it does not contain two faces or edges, respectively, which are of the same type. The main results of that part are theorems that show the finiteness of the class of such oblique polyhedral graphs. In some cases it is shown that a large enough polyhedral graph always contains more than z faces or edges of a common type, where z is an arbitrary positive integer. The finiteness results on oblique polyhedral graphs are generalized for maps on orientable surfaces. In the second part of the work oblique structures in arbitrary graphs are investigated. A graph is called vertex-oblique if any two vertices differ in the degree sequence of their neighbors. It is shown that even under additional restrictive properties for the considered graphs the set of vertex-oblique graphs is infinite. Moreover, it is proved, that the probability of a random graph to be vertex-oblique tends to 1 as the order of the graph tends to infinity if the probability p of an edge to belong to the edge set of the graph is within given bounds.
منابع مشابه
Dually vertex-oblique graphs
A vertex with neighbours of degrees d1 ≥ · · · ≥ dr has vertex type (d1, . . . , dr). A graph is vertex-oblique if each vertex has a distinct vertex-type. While no graph can have distinct degrees, Schreyer, Walther and Mel’nikov [Vertex oblique graphs, same proceedings] have constructed infinite classes of super vertex-oblique graphs, where the degree-types of G are distinct even from the degre...
متن کاملVertex-oblique graphs
Let x be a vertex of a simple graph G. The vertex-type of x is the lexicographically ordered degree sequence of its neighbors. We call the graph G vertex-oblique if there are no two vertices in V (G) which are of the same vertex-type. We will show that the set of vertex-oblique graphs of arbitrary connectivity is infinite. © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
متن کاملTriangle-Free Planar Graphs and Segment Intersection Graphs
We prove that every triangle-free planar graph is the graph of intersection of a set of segments in the plane. Moreover, the segments can be chosen in only three directions (horizontal, vertical and oblique) and in such a way that no two segments cross, i.e., intersect in a common
متن کاملPerception of Gradient in Haptic Graphs by Sighted and Visually Impaired Subjects
We report an experiment that presented visually impaired and sighted users with virtually rendered haptic two-line graphs of various orientations. Participants made a forced-choice decision on whether a stimulus was convergent, parallel, or divergent. The use of complex linear haptic graphs was investigated. Possible variations in performance patterns for overall two-line orientations of 0 (ver...
متن کاملBinary invariants and orientations of graphs
It is well known that Julius Petersen’s famous paper on graph factorisation [9] has its origin in a problem which arose in connection with Hilbert’s proof of the Finite Basis Theorem for the invariants of binary forms [3]. Once one accepts the graph theoretic framework, the reformulation of the algebraic problem is straightforward and needs only a minimum of explanation-at least in the context ...
متن کامل